web space | website hosting | Business Hosting | Free Website Submission | shopping cart | php hosting

Canada's Undisclosed "New Deal"



 

Common Law Court Procedure

The Common Law Court consists of a properly drawn Statement of Claim. The claim is then served by bailiff upon the violating party, or, where the violating party is unavailable for service, a legal notice in a local newspaper's legal notices section one day during four consecutive weeks.

That party has 20 legal (week) days to either make recompense for the claimed debt, or go to the sheriff and request a jury trial. If the violating party does nothing within the 20 legal days, a default judgment is issued by the injured party, either by service and or legal notice. If the Claim is disputed, then the Sheriff becomes part of the common law court. The Sheriff calls the common law jury and keeps order, and collects judgments.

The Clerk of the Court, any court is the record keeper. If clerks of the current de facto court system refuse to file your common law documents in court records, the legal section of the local newspaper suffices.

All of our physical being falls within the catagory of "property". The "bundle of rights" of the Common law Right of Property under authority of the common law is: the unalienable right to own, use, sell, exchange, give away and bequeath property. The act of selling, exchanging or giving away property entails a private contract - a mechanism either written, spoken or assumed, whereby that contract is available as evidence in a court of common law for the purposes of proof of a willing exchange or to effect the equalization of exchange - settle a debt. Any outside (third party) interference in a common law court is an interference in a private contract and associated enforcement of that contract, thus making the interfering party a co-debtor with the violating party.

The act by a man/woman in violating the rights - property of another man/woman is, in effect a contract wherein the injured party has not offered a price to the violating party for the property taken or destroyed. Thus, an injured party serves a claim/invoice upon the violating party which the injured party believes is an equitable settlement for that property or right lost. Should the violating party choose to present his/her case to a jury of equal status men/women (peers), then that jury can decide if the claim/invoice is equitable, or if it should be reduced or increased according to the common law jury's findings in the case.

If the violating party does not dispute the claim, or, a jury finds for the injured party, then the injured party can collect the debt by lien and seizure of property. This is a duty of the sheriff. If there is no sheriff; or, if the sheriff refuses to do his duty, then physical action may be used against the violating party by the injured party, or by any other man or men called by the injured party to collect the debt or cause physical retribution upon the violating party.

The Claim

The Common Law CLAIM shall address the man (male or female) in their given and family or clan names. The Common Law ONLY recognizes a free will full liability mind. The body of a man is a vessel for the mind, and is the private property of the mind. The Common Law judges the motives of the mind, not the physical actions of a man's body. A Common Law Claim may be filed into the records of any court, or in the newspaper that is designated by government to be the carrier of legal notices. The amount of times required for posting of claims may vary from province to province. A Common Law Claim must be served to the accused party by bailiff.

COMMON LAW COURT PROCEDURE

The Common Law Court DOES NOT consist of a courthouse, judges, Crown Councils or lawyers. It DOES NOT recognize any make-believe "officers" of make-believe ships called bodies corporate or bodies politic. Any interference in an Anglo-Saxon Common Law court by any make-believe officer of a body politic constitutes interference in the course of true justice - thus making such officer liable for the debt/co-debtor of the violating party.

The Common Law of the land DOES NOT consist of the Queen's/King's law. The Anglo Saxon Common Law is "God's Law", which we commonly know as the Golden Rule; and, therefore the Anglo-Saxon Common Law Court is God's Court, NOT the Queen's/King's Court.

From recent evidence presented to the High Court of Great Britain by the movement to nullify the false Australian constitution and government (March 6/03), "the Queen is a Public Servant! She is a part and parcel of the United Kingdom Parliament, and consequently she does not hold any Executive Authority over Canada, nor has she ever had any Executive Authority over over Canada.

"How can the Queen be a constitutional Monarch in Canada, when as an independent State, we have never set-up a Monarchy; nor, have we set-up an Act of Secession?" The Statutes Revision Act of 1893 (BR.) rescinded Section 2 of the BNA Act 1867, the Secession right of British Monarchs provision for Canada. "The Privy Council has replied in writing: The Queen cannot by British Law, hold a Constitutional or Executive Position in other than the United Kingdom." The current situation in Canada is absolutely impossible in British Law. The Privy Council has confirmed, that as the British Parliament has no Executive Authority over Canada, therefore the Queen cannot have any authority over Canada.

What Is A Common Law Court?

The Claim must be entitled "Claim At Common Law"

The Claimant must introduce himself/herself in the first paragraph with their full given and family name and state their status as a full liability free will man/woman, and declare that they make claim as follows:

The Accused (do not use "defendant") must be named using full names in proper noun fashion - no initials. Suggested format: John Smith, acting as judge for the Provincial Court of Ontario, a de facto corporate commercial court. The term "acting as" is very important to signify that the man is "in the fiction" against a man in the free will full liability flesh and blood. Supposing John Smith is a CRA agent who has committed treason against you..... The second paragraph would read something like this:
The Accused, John Smith, acting as Canada Revenue Agent (CRA) out of the CRA office at ___ did commit an act of nuisance in the manner of treason against this Claimant on or about _date_ by the following actions, to wit: (describe criminal acts) T.he sum of actual damages (losses, lost work, expenses) in the amount of $______ plus statutory compensation in the amount of $_______ (find in Criminal code) totaling $_________________ is demanded from the Accused. Twenty(20) legal days from date of service of this claim are hereby given for a proper answer.

Any trespass / interference in this claim by a de facto corporate commercial court or court officers for the same shall result in immediate declaration of default judgment. Any de facto corporate commercial court officer who chooses to interfere in a private common law contract shall be included as co-accused subject to financial responsibility for any judgments or default judgments. Failure of the Accused to make a proper answer within the allotted time of twenty (20) legal days will result in a default judgment and collection by distraint. Sworn or declared before me this (day) of (date) at (city/town)