web space | website hosting | Business Hosting Services | Free Website Submission | shopping cart | php hosting

Comparison of the True Nature of Canadian courts



 

BNA Act and the Canadian Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms: s. 32 applies only to actions of the government, it's agencies/corporations and employees, not to private men and women;

Legislation - Antecedent to England, Magna Charta, English Bill of Rights 1689; and/or lawfully passed by Parliament, given Royal Assent, and published in the Canada Gazette e.g. Canadian Bill of Rights; The Bill of Rights is mis-named. It guarantees no rights. It is in fact a bill of prohibitions. It details what the government is prohibited from doing.

Case law - Decisions adjudicated are not common law. Most, if not all, case law decisions today are made in a 'administrative/military/equity' quasi-judicial quasi-criminal court-like setting in chambers. These decisions are not a precedent under common law, nor are they applicable to the common law, under the common law.

Code Civil/Criminal – colorable admiralty/military law; Civil law is the law that evolved from Roman law, based on a written code

Common Law Court

ADMINISTRATIVE COURT

Description - Lawful

DESCRIPTION - LEGAL

Natural common law is the law of the land. It is everyone’s birthright, as it is based on custom and usage, partly derived from the Magna Charta. The Magna Charta forever establishes the principle that no one, be it king, lawmaker, or legislator is above natural common law.

Common law has two basic requirements: Do not hurt anyone or their property, honor all contracts. The negative golden rule applies: Don't do something to someone that you don't want done to you. Natural common law is not written, enacted or codified. Common law does not take authority from any bodies politic.

 

 

"Statutory / civil law" is the law that evolved from Roman law, based on written code, statutes, and regulations. It is applicable only to government employees. It is bogus admiralty/military law. Administrative Law is also known under these names: Equity / Civil / Statutory / Admiralty-Maritime-Commercial-Military Law.

 

True / proper name = the living soul

E.g. Jane Ann Doe


LEGAL PERSON [ALITY] = JURIDICAL PERSON[ALITY] per Quebec Charter of Human Rights ch. 1, part 1
HUMAN BEING = MONSTER, ANIMAL
LEGAL IDENTITY = ARTIFICIAL ENTITY = JURIDICAL PERSON [ALITY] = LEGAL FICTON = PERSON

Prisoner of war name = Fictitious nom de guerre name
for a non-living entity: also refered to as the STRAWMAN

E.g. JANE ANN DOE; DOE, JANE A; DOE, Jane A;

Inherent birthrights cannot be infringed, abrogated or abridged by the state or anyone in any context.

1) Right to contract, to accept/reject any contract

2) Right to a common law fair trial with an unbiased jury of 12 like peers

3) Right to speak for yourself or have anyone else speak for you

4) Right to be informed of true nature of the accusation whether it is civil or criminal and the cause of the accusations

5) Right that all evidence will be used, including all alleged contracts, be placed in evidence of the the court

6) Right to introduce evidence

7) Right to face accuser personally and not paperwork

8) Right to call witnesses


Administrative law can only recognize entities that are CREATURES OF LAW, a JURIDICAL PERSON [ALITY] – entities have been given a role to perform with duties and obligations in which performance is compelled at the point of a gun. e.g. Taxpayer.

Civil rights are granted as a privilege to creatures of law, they are deemed to be PERSONS with only civil rights, privileges and licenses, which may be granted or denied by the state.

In an admiralty court, one is dealing with an administrative tribunal, wherein unalienable birthrights are expunged and held hostage to the cash register. Lawyers call a creature of law a legal fiction, or a corporation.

Juridical personality is 'given, granted' by an operation of law. E.g. birth certificate. A legal fiction / juridical personality is the legal means created by the state to exercise jurisdiction in an administrative law court over the living soul.

Innocent until proven guilty


Unalienable - God-Given Rights
Strict rules – Biblical – Natural Common Law and the Bible are totally compatible


Living soul petitioners – e.g. John Henry Smith and Jane Ann Doe

No victimless crime - Bona fide injured party, corpus delecti, must have done harm to people or property

Guilty until proven innocent

DEFENDANT/PERSON = CORPORATION
CORPORATION - An artificial entity, a legal fiction/entity, indivisible, intangible, existing only in the mind.
CORPORATION vs. CORPORATION e.g. REGINA vs. UR A. SUCKER
FICTITIOUS PLAINTIFFS only – only Alphabet Agency/Institution/Corporation/State


Victimless Crime is condoned and sanctioned – Alphabet Agency/Institution/Corporation/State claims 'it is the injured party, the alleged crime is against the STATE. Agents for the STATE have given the STATE a JURIDICAL PERSON[ALITY], so IT cannot be injured and lives forever.

 

 

De jure means "of the light" and natural justice. A de jure judge in the common law is also known as foreman


Accused has inherent birthright to trial - jury of 12 peers and one foreman


Foreman and 12 peers - hears only the living soul


12 Peers - decides findings by fact and conclusions of common law. Foreman - accepts 12 peer’s decision of fact and conclusions of common law


12 peers - control the trial; judge justice by law and fact alone; determine admissibility of evidence; apply law to facts; render verdict according to conscience


Stare Decisis – Latin phrase meaning "Let the decision stand.” Peers must follow precedent; like cases alike

De Facto - means "there in fact" and is not of law, but emergency, war and necessity.


De Facto judge - adjudicator replaces judge and administers public WAR policy.


Quasi-judicial – only administrative law is on offer to PERSON/LEGAL FICTION
Quasi-criminal – secret, hidden, mixed jurisdiction of civil/admiralty/equity - uses case law made by previous adjudicators or government officials and calls it common law.


Court has many names - Equity Courts, Municipal Courts, Statutory court, Merchant Law, Military Law, Marshall Law, Summary proceedings

Courts are corporate arbitration boards consisting of an Arbitrator, so-called "Judge", and a panel of corporate government employees known as PERSONS, so-called "Juries"

Adjudicator commonly called judge - ruling=opinion by whim, discretion, public policy not law; biased, prejudicial e.g. appointed and paid by the STATE; the STATE judges its own case, and is a party to their own action; can make any act a crime; impose penal and monetary sanctions at whim and discretion; practices colorable law from the bench; hears only officers of the court e.g. lawyers; they are adjudicator’s ‘in chambers’ ‘administering public war policy’

In chambers - the court functions as private corporate arbitration board as the private fiefdom of the adjudicator to increase the flow of revenue from their mock-court

No stare decisis - Means no precedent binds any court, because they have no law standard of absolute right and wrong by which to measure a ruling—what is legal today may not be legal tomorrow.

 

Invoking a common law jury and court to hear the case - Each party chooses six willing peers and the peers choose a thirteenth man/woman to be the foreman. The foreman, commonly called ‘judge’ only votes in case of a tie and should be well versed in common law. This court can be held in private and all matters decided and adjudicated can remain private matters and are held in strict confidence during and after the trial. The foreman puts into writing the decision of the jury of 12 peers and everyone is expected to abide by it.


The right of Jury nullification - This is when a common law jury returns a verdict of "Innocent". In effect, the jury nullifies a law it believes is either immoral or wrongly applied to the accused whose fate and freedom they are charged with deciding. The jury's power to veto bad laws is absolute. The "jury" refers to 12 people empowered to judge both the law and the certified evidence. All have a right to ‘judge’, both to determine the law as well as the proven facts in controversy. In a sense, there are twelve judges in attendance, not just one and all have the inherent power to review the "law" as well as the "facts". The "judge also known as foreman" is there to conduct the proceedings in an orderly fashion.

 

No right to trial by jury - sole adjudicator controls mock-trial; pretence of a jury as advisory to adjudicator; adjudicator determines admissibility of evidence; jury must accept the color of law/evidence as given by adjudicator; jury renders verdict according to what adjudicator dictates as evidence; what evidence is presented is controlled and manipulated by the adjudicator; adjudicator can override jury; jury plays passive role of observer


No first hand witnesses – affidavit, piece of paper is sufficient, commonly missing
No evidence necessary – no certified proof entered into the record of the court; evidence ignored


No law permitted - Law of necessity & law of the jungle, suspension of all law other than complete freedom to act in any manner to eat, kill, or destroy or avoid being eaten, killed, or destroyed


So-called "court decisions" are administrative opinions only and are basically decided on the basis of
"What is best for the corporate government."


Ignorance of the law is no excuse – 60 million pseudo laws on the books assume all PERSONS are guilty of something. The more so-called laws, the more revenue generated.

Due process of common law - Canadian Bill of Rights and English Bill of Rights guarantee

Perfected service/summons in lawful accordance of due process of common law
court service – served only by another living soul not by anyone in a corporate capacity

Common law summons contains no codes, rules, regulations, statutory law;

Common law summons addressed to the living soul styled in proper noun format

 

Due process of law is optional and is only a process. - Results are irrelevant. It is said justice has been ‘served’ or ‘made an appearance’ if, in theory, rules and procedures have been followed. Legal matters administrate, conform to, and follow rules. They are equitable in nature and are presumed rather than actual. A legal process defective in law is color of law however Gestapo-like tactics are used without qualm.


Adversarial - the procedure of the common law is that arguments are addressed orally to the court, and the evidence is directly presented to it or to the jury who decides questions of fact but also those of law.

No need for lawyers - living soul is their own authority, their court of good conscience

Inquisitorial - lawyers are officers of the court, loyal to the court, and only present favorable evidence, along with conspiring with the adjudicator to offer public war policy. The lawyer exists to protect the court; they have the power to summarily expedite cases and/or to directly influence case. The scales of ‘justice’ are balanced in favor of PERSONS represented by lawyers, and how deep your pockets are.

Lawyers - witness and testify; they present hearsay evidence. They are third part interveners and never have first hand evidence. They are not competent witnesses nor can any statements they make be truth and fact. Plus, they creatively re-interpret any event to fit any scenario. They deal in assumptions, hearsay, and dishonor.

Lawyers first sworn duty is to the court - Procedures are selectively followed. Their first duty is to appease adjudicators. Their second duty is to increase their own income, billable hours.

 

Under authority of Common Law:

1) All are totally responsible for our actions

2) All retain the right to refuse an order/contract from anyone

3) All retain right to reject defective service/summons of an administrative tribunal

4) All retain right to reject the jurisdiction of an administrative tribunal, or it's findings/orders

5) No written law compels anyone to obey any court rules as they apply to lawyers, members of the court. There exists no license, oath to the Bar Society, or to the government itself. Nor does parliament or any of the provinces have the power to enact a legal duty to obey government laws

6) No written law exists to lawfully bind anyone to a foreign jurisdiction against their freewill and good judgment

Individually endowed by Almighty God with certain unalienable Rights. That among these are the Right to:
1) Life
2) Own, Care For, Control, And Provide For My Own Body;
3) Reproduce;
4) Care For, Control, And Provide For My Own Children;
5) Liberty;
6) Defend All Rights Of Myself, My Family, And My Fellow Man;
7) Own, Possess, Move and Convey Property;
8) Pursue Happiness;
9) Privacy; right to be left alone
10) Worship God in my own way;
11) Free Speech, Teach, Publish and Assemble;
12) Keep and Bear Arms;
13) Cultivate, Possess, And Bestow All Fruits Of Nature And Of Nature’s God In Accordance With The Will Of Almighty God As Recorded In Genesis Chapter One Verse Twenty Nine;
14) Contract;
15) Establish Commerce;
16) Free Enterprise;
17) Unimpeded Movement;
18) Own, Possess, Maintain And Operate A Means of Travel;
19) A Republican Form Of Government;
20) Be Presumed Innocent;
21) Assistance Of Counsel;
22) Due Process Of Law, Equal Protection of Law
23) Know The Nature And Cause Of Any Accusation Or Action Against Me And To Be Provided
With A Written Copy Thereof;
24) Confront All Accusers;
25) Trial By Jury In A Court Of Record According To The Rules Of The Common Law;
26) A Speedy Trial;
27) A Writ Of Habeas Corpus And All Other Common Law Rights;
28) Be Free From Standing Under Any And All Statutes, Codes, Ordinances, Or Rules Conflicting
with The Common Law;
29) Petition The Government For A Redress Of Grievances
30) Earn A Living;
31) Be Secure At All Times In The Exercise Of All My Rights, Unencumbered By Any Liens Or Unlawful Trespass Of Any Kind.
32) Hunt and Fish
33) Practice Law

Jurisdiction - the ‘right to rule’ is ASSumed by unspoken consent; the whole illusion rests upon consent

Subject matter jurisdiction - Presumption of an international maritime contract in force and in effect; that DEFENDANT upon acceptance/signing of an alleged contract agreed to be held liable for any kind of abuse e.g. registered mail, summons; service of any kind. If there is no certified evidence, a bona fide contract in the record of the subject matter, there is no subject matter jurisdiction.

Appearance – grants jurisdiction, gives permission to use administrative law; also any document that signifies intent to defend, signifies the DEFENDANT/PERSON has accepted (attorned to) the jurisdiction of the court and waives any objections regarding jurisdiction. If a DEFENDANT/PERSON says the originating process is flawed, invalid or has expired, or service is defective, they should not enter an appearance as the court has no jurisdiction over them in the proceeding and should decline jurisdiction e.g. VOID LACK OF JURISDICTION, OFFER DENIED.

A voluntary appearance at a courthouse will be interpreted as a consent to jurisdiction of that court, so, any appearance or acquiescence with a demand or request will constitute acceptance of jurisdiction. Any compliance with requests, commands, demands summons is conformation of acceptance.

Trial - administrative procedure of a dissident slave.